Calendar for Ann M. Nevins

10:00 AM

26-30139 Manuel D. Medeiros, Jr. Ch. 13

#16; Objection to Debtor's Claim of Exemptions with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#22; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Manuel D. Medeiros Jr. Debtor (RE: 11 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Manuel D. Medeiros)

26-30154 Brahim Gouhmid Ch. 13

#11; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Joseph J. D'Agostino Jr. on behalf of Brahim Gouhmid Debtor .

26-30162 Katherine M. Pacholyk Ch. 13

#7; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Mark M. Kratter on behalf of Katherine M. Pacholyk Debtor .

26-30202 Nathan Thomas Dwyer Ch. 13

#11; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Theresa Rose DeGray on behalf of Nathan Thomas Dwyer Debtor (RE: 4 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Nathan Thomas Dwyer)

#17; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments and Inability to Propose a Confirmable Plan Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

26-30208 Woody Allan Frasier Ch. 13

#5; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Woody Allan Frasier Debtor .

26-30216 Michelle Scott Ch. 13

#23; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Michelle Scott Debtor (RE: 18 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Michelle Scott)

10:30 AM

25-30005 Miguel M. Simon Ch. 13

#59; Motion to Dismiss Case for failure to provide for allowed claims Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#63; Motion to Modify a Confirmed Plan Filed by Susan M. Williams on behalf of Miguel M. Simon, Debtor (RE: 50 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Miguel M. Simon) (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)

25-30972 Charles T. Murphy and Cathleen Patricia Murphy Ch. 13

#38; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Janine M. Becker on behalf of Cathleen Patricia Murphy, Charles T. Murphy Debtors (RE: 13 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Charles T. Murphy, Debtor Cathleen Patricia Murphy)

#44; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On October 16, 2025, the Debtors commenced this case by filing a petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 25-30972. The Debtors are required to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for an unreasonable delay by the Debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). ACCORDINGLY, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 25, 2026, the Debtors may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 24, 2026.

26-30212 MaryAnn Papacoda Ch. 13

#31; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of MaryAnn Papacoda Debtor (RE: 19 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor MaryAnn Papacoda)

26-30217 Morgan Barrett Douglas and Jason Michael Douglas Ch. 13

#25; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Jason Michael Douglas, Morgan Barrett Douglas Debtors (RE: 20 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Morgan Barrett Douglas, Debtor Jason Michael Douglas)

19-31185 Barry K. Collins Ch. 13

#247; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement plan payment receipt schedule)

23-30032 Rose M. Rick Ch. 13

#89; Motion to Modify a Confirmed Plan Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Rose M. Rick, Debtor (RE: 25 Amended/Modified Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Rose M. Rick) (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)

26-30017 Sarah Deleonardo Ch. 13

#40; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before May 15, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On May 21, 2026, at 10:30 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 27, 2026.

#55; Fourth Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Sarah Deleonardo Debtor (RE: 47 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Sarah Deleonardo)

26-30183 Dana Lee Dicenso Ch. 13

#9; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Audra Buckland on behalf of Dana Lee Dicenso Debtor .

#16; Objection to Debtor's Claim of Exemptions with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

26-30204 Matthew P. Schaefer Ch. 13

#9; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Audra Buckland on behalf of Matthew P. Schaefer Debtor .

11:00 AM

25-30967 Gisele Reese Ch. 13

#15; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Gisele Reese Debtor .

#44; Amended Motion to Determine Claim Status Filed by Gisele Reese, Debtor (RE: 42 Motion to Determine Claim Status filed by Debtor Gisele Reese) Contested Matter Response(s) due by 3/17/2026.

25-30551 Kelli Cornelius Ch. 13

#28; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On June 13, 2025, the Debtor commenced this case by filing a petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A confirmation hearing has been scheduled and if the Chapter 13 Plan is not confirmed on the hearing date, the Debtor will be required to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for an unreasonable delay by the Debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1); ACCORDINGLY, it is herebyORDERED: On or before November 17, 2025, the Debtor may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On December 4, 2025, at 1:00 p.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut; and it is furtherORDERED: In the absence of a confirmed Chapter 13 Plan or a written response showing cause to not dismiss this case, the case will be dismissed without further notice or hearing. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on October 27, 2025.

#34; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Kelli Cornelius Debtor (RE: 10 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Kelli Cornelius)

25-31199 Jerome A. Cariaso Ch. 13

#16; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#25; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On December 24, 2025, the Debtor commenced this case by filing a petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 25-31199. Consistent with the hearing held on February 26, 2026, the Debtor is required to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for an unreasonable delay by the Debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). ACCORDINGLY, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, the Debtor may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 02:30 p.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 27, 2026.

#31; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Jerome A. Cariaso Debtor (RE: 18 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Jerome A. Cariaso)

23-30967 Alfred Williams, Jr. Ch. 13

#80; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

25-30364 Ian J. Speanburg and Cathleen A. Speanburg Ch. 13

#77; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

25-30865 Russell J. Taylor Ch. 13

#38; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before February 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On February 26, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on January 20, 2026.

#51; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Russell J. Taylor Debtor (RE: 41 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Russell J. Taylor)

25-30899 Susan Delgrippo Jaramillo Ch. 13

#33; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before February 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On February 26, 2026, at 11:30 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on January 20, 2026.

#43; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Susan Delgrippo Jaramillo Debtor (RE: 20 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Susan Delgrippo Jaramillo)

25-30983 Frederick C. Walker and Candace P. Walker Ch. 13

#36; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before February 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On February 26, 2026, at 11:30 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M Nevins on January 20, 2026.

#51; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Candace P. Walker, Frederick C. Walker Debtors (RE: 40 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Frederick C. Walker, Debtor Candace P. Walker)

11:30 AM

25-30870 Robert L. Rice Ch. 13

#30; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before February 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On February 26, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M Nevins on January 20, 2026.

#71; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Robert L. Rice Debtor (RE: 45 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Robert L. Rice)

25-31071 Emma W. Tavares Ch. 13

#24; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before February 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On February 26, 2026, at 1:30 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M Nevins on January 20, 2026

#48; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Emma W. Tavares Debtor (RE: 42 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Emma W. Tavares)

25-31163 Kathryne B. Ryan Ch. 13

#32; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 20, 2026.

#51; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Kathryne B. Ryan Debtor (RE: 41 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Kathryne B. Ryan)

25-31175 Egan Kealey and Annaliese Sehulster Ch. 13

#16; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Egan Kealey, Annaliese Sehulster Debtors (RE: 11 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Egan Kealey, Debtor Annaliese Sehulster)

#29; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtors have enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtors sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, 2026, the Debtors may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 20, 2026.

25-31203 Lee Anne Goerg Ch. 13

#39; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 20, 2026.

#48; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Lee Anne Goerg Debtor (RE: 41 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Lee Anne Goerg)

26-30001 Nebyat Shewaye Ch. 13

#28; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On January 2, 2026, the Debtor commenced this Chapter 13 case. To date, the Debtor has not confirmed a Chapter 13 Plan, despite the substantial amount of time that has passed. During the time after the petition date, the Chapter 13 Trustee has not dispersed any funds to any creditor, yet the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). This delay may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).ORDERED: On or before March 18, 2025, the Debtor may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 23, 2026.

#48; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Nebyat Shewaye Debtor (RE: 39 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Nebyat Shewaye)

26-30006 Lakeysha J. Fields Ch. 13

#15; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Lakeysha J. Fields Debtor (RE: 11 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Lakeysha J. Fields)

#27; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 20, 2026.

01:00 PM

26-30244 Raymond Manuel Rivera and Rosa Maria Rivera Ch. 13

#26; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Raymond Manuel Rivera, Rosa Maria Rivera Debtors (RE: 9 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Raymond Manuel Rivera, Debtor Rosa Maria Rivera)

26-30248 Frederick D. Gatling Ch. 13

#18; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#10; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Frederick D. Gatling Debtor .

26-30304 Anthony A. Alvarado Ch. 13

#10; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Anthony A. Alvarado Debtor .

26-30262 Antonio Vargas, Jr. Ch. 13

#12; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Antonio Vargas Jr. Debtor .

26-30271 Gioconda Elena Bauza Ch. 13

#15; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Gioconda Elena Bauza Debtor (RE: 11 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Gioconda Elena Bauza)

26-30299 Sabrina Myers Ch. 13

#16; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Sabrina Myers Debtor (RE: 10 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Sabrina Myers)

26-30300 Mia N. Bridgeforth Ch. 13

#9; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Audra Buckland on behalf of Mia N. Bridgeforth Debtor .

01:30 PM

25-31196 Diane Tanguay Ch. 13

#49; Fourth Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Diane Tanguay Debtor (RE: 39 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Diane Tanguay)

26-30038 Leona J. Moffo Ch. 13

#39; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Leona J. Moffo Debtor (RE: 28 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Leona J. Moffo)

#41; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Leona J. Moffo Debtor (RE: 39 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Leona J. Moffo)

26-30068 Ariel Melendez Ch. 13

#20; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Carl T. Gulliver on behalf of Ariel Melendez Debtor (RE: 11 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Ariel Melendez)

25-30562 Jayquis Brock Ch. 13

#47; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement plan payment receipt schedule)

26-30008 Paul F. Tommasino Ch. 13

#10; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Audra Buckland on behalf of Paul F. Tommasino Debtor .

#16; Objection to Debtor's Claim of Exemptions with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Trustee.

#20; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 20, 2026.

26-30098 Keith Urquhart Ch. 13

#13; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Keith Urquart Debtor (RE: 9 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Keith Urquart)

#19; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#28; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before April 10, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On April 23, 2026, at 2:30 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 27, 2026.

26-30101 Davon M. Johnson Ch. 13

#26; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before April 17, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On April 23, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 27, 2026.

#31; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Davon M. Johnson Debtor (RE: 22 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Davon M. Johnson)

26-30269 Miguel Suero Ch. 13

#10; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Audra Buckland on behalf of Miguel Suero Debtor .

02:00 PM

23-30713 Jennifer Jane Grady Ch. 13

#186; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

25-30991 Charles L. Gargano Ch. 13

#36; Objection to Debtor's Claim of Exemptions with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Trustee.

#46; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before February 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On February 26, 2026, at 10:30 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on January 26, 2026.

#62; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments , Provide Documents, File a Plan that Conforms to the Proofs of Claim Filed and Show Feasible with Proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#66; 4th Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Joseph J. D'Agostino Jr. on behalf of Charles L. Gargano Debtor (RE: 57 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Charles L. Gargano)

#71; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 21 Brown Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06511. Receipt #A11793414 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual Capacity But Solely As Owner Trustee For Rcf 2 Acquisition Trust, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 3/12/2026.

26-30097 Richard Doolittle Ch. 13

#12; Motion to Extend Automatic Stay . Filed by Joseph J. D'Agostino Jr. on behalf of Richard Doolittle, Debtor. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2 Affidavit)

#46; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Joseph J. D'Agostino Jr. on behalf of Richard Doolittle Debtor (RE: 11 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Richard Doolittle)

26-30018 Cassandra Lynn Bera Ch. 13

#18; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#23; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Christopher H. Thogmartin on behalf of Cassandra Lynn Bera Debtor (RE: 2 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Cassandra Lynn Bera)

26-30129 David D. Barata Ch. 13

#4; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Jefferson Hanna III on behalf of David D. Barata Debtor .

#25; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before May 14, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On May 21, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on April 27, 2026.

#29; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jefferson Hanna III on behalf of David D. Barata Debtor (RE: 4 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor David D. Barata)

25-30555 Meredith Marr Ch. 13

#61; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

26-30102 Derek Palange and Karen Lynn Palange Ch. 13

#44; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtors have enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtors sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before May 14, 2026, the Debtors may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On May 21, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on April 27, 2026.

#49; Fifth Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Derek Palange, Karen Lynn Palange Debtors (RE: 33 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Derek Palange, Debtor Karen Lynn Palange)

26-30123 Susan Godek Ch. 13

#25; Application to Employ Ariana F. Ceneviva of the Ceneviva Law Firm, LLC as Closing Counsel re: 201 New Cheshire Road, Wallingford, CT Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Susan Godek, Debtor.

#36; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Susan Godek Debtor (RE: 22 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Susan Godek)

02:30 PM

22-30331 Marcella Harling Ch. 13

#112; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments and Non-Exempt Personal Injury Proceeds with Proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit plan payment receipt schedule)

23-30173 Mary Regina Odom Ch. 13

#133; Motion to Modify a Confirmed Plan Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Mary Regina Odom, Debtor (RE: 71 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Mary Regina Odom) (Attachments: # 1 Supplement 1st Modified Plan # 2 Proposed Order)

25-30406 Madeleine Hudgens Ch. 13

#72; Motion to Modify a Confirmed Plan Filed by George W. Derbyshire on behalf of Madeleine Hudgens, Debtor (RE: 47 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Madeleine Hudgens)

25-31177 Allen R. McIntyre and Gale J. McIntyre Ch. 13

#35; Motion to Dismiss Case Under-Funded with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#37; Motion to Modify a Confirmed Plan Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Allen R. McIntyre, Gale J. McIntyre, Debtors (RE: 18 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Allen R. McIntyre, Debtor Gale J. McIntyre) (Attachments: # 1 Supplement 1st Modified Plan # 2 Proposed Order) (Tzepos, George) Modified on 3/19/2026, The Motion to Modify Plan and Modified Plan must be filed separately on the docket. Please re-file the Motion and Modified Plan separately

26-30038 Leona J. Moffo Ch. 13

#14; Objection to Debtor's Claim of Exemptions with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Trustee.

#22; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before April 16, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On April 23, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 27, 2026.

26-30086 Tampa Kikia Napoleon Ch. 13

#20; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#32; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before April 10, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On April 23, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 27, 2026.

#37; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Tampa Kikia Napoleon Debtor (RE: 28 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Tampa Kikia Napoleon)

26-30135 Alexander Pena Reyes Ch. 13

#17; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Alexander Pena Reyes Debtor (RE: 10 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Alexander Pena Reyes)

#26; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#39; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before May 14, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On May 21, 2026, at 2:30 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on April 27, 2026.

03:00 PM

22-30289 Harvel E. Brooks Ch. 13

#140; Order Granting Motion To Determine Claim Status (RE: 70).

#158; Order regarding Motion for Authority to Compromise Claim (RE: 146).

#160; Amended Schedules EF,. with signed Amended Declaration About an Individual Debtor's Schedules Fee Amount $34. Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Harvel E. Brooks Debtor.. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Certification of Service)

22-30424 Kimberly A. Leak Ch. 13

#132; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

25-31198 Anthony R. Ellis Ch. 13

#32; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On December 24, 2025, the Debtor commenced this case by filing a petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 25-31198. Consistent with the hearing held on February 26, 2026, the Debtor is required to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for an unreasonable delay by the Debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). ACCORDINGLY, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, the Debtor may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 02:30 p.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 27, 2026.

#38; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Anthony R. Ellis Debtor (RE: 24 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Anthony R. Ellis)

Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted.

Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform.

A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

02:00 PM
	26-03003 Brady v. Navient Solutions, LLC Ch.
	Adversary proceeding: 04-35377 Christopher A. Brady #1; Adversary case 26-03003. Complaint (63 (Dischargeability - 523(a)(8), student loan)) filed by Stanley Love Tate III on behalf of Christopher A. Brady against Navient Solutions, LLC. Receipt #NotDue Fee Amount $350. Fee Not Due. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet)
	Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted. Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform. A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

10:00 AM
	21-30086 Bee Chu Ng Ch. 13
	#126; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 380 Hitchcock Road, Unit 45, Waterbury, Connecticut. Receipt #A11801593 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Gregory F. Arcaro on behalf of Countrywood Hills Condominium Association, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 3/18/2026.
	22-30417 Patricia A. Zorskis Ch. 13
	#98; Motion to Compromise Claim with Elizabeth Deleo, 156 Judd Hill Road, Middlebury, CT 06762 Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Patricia A. Zorskis, Debtor. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2 Supplement P I Lawyer Settlement Ltr)
	23-30290 Bruce Smith and Flor Smith Ch. 13
	#58; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 149 Whittier Road, New Haven, CT 06515. Receipt #A11830028 Fee Amount $199. Filed by A. Michelle Hart Ippoliti on behalf of NewRez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 4/8/2026.
	23-30967 Alfred Williams, Jr. Ch. 13
	#75; Affidavit of Non-Compliance with Certificate of Service Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR BCAT 2020-3TT AS SERVICED BY FAY SERVICING, LLC, Creditor. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (St. Pierre, Linda). Related document(s) 28 Stipulation filed by Creditor WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR BCAT 2020-3TT. Modified on 2/3/2026
	25-30126 Juanita Bryant Ch. 13
	#56; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 350 Shelton Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut 06511. certificate of service (350 Shelton Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut 06511) Receipt #A11828996 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS OWNER TRUSTEE FOR RCF 2 ACQUISITION TRUST, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 4/8/2026. (St. Pierre, Linda) Modified on 3/25/2026 to change receipt #11828963 to correct receipt #A11828996
	26-30162 Katherine M. Pacholyk Ch. 13
	#15; Motion For Relief From Automatic Stay And Co-Debtor Stay Including In Rem Relief regarding 62 Allison Drive Madison, Connecticut 06443. Receipt #A11837346 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Sara Buchanan on behalf of Wilmington Trust, National Association, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Trustee for MF, Creditor, in addition to Motion for Relief from Stay for Co-Debtor regarding 62 Allison Drive Madison, Connecticut 06443 Filed by Sara Buchanan on behalf of Wilmington Trust, National Association, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Trustee for MF, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 4/15/2026. (Buchanan, Sara) Modified on 4/1/2026
	Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted. Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform. A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

02:00 PM
	26-03002 Russo v. United States Department of Education Ch.
	Adversary proceeding: 25-31190 Jillian R. Russo #1; Adversary case 26-03002. Complaint with Adversary Proceeding Cover Sheet and Exhibit "A" (63 (Dischargeability - 523(a)(8), student loan)) filed by Paige M. Vaillancourt on behalf of Jillian R. Russo against United States Department of Education. Receipt #NotDue Fee Amount $350. Fee Not Due.
02:30 PM
	25-03007 Vereen v. Scruggs Ch.
	Adversary proceeding: 25-30607 Deidra M Scruggs #17; Motion to Withdraw Appearance Filed by Scott M. Charmoy on behalf of Dairwood Vereen, Plaintiff .
	Adversary proceeding: 25-30607 Deidra M Scruggs #20; Motion to Extend Time to (Motion for Extension of Time of Sixty Days of All Deadlines and Continuation of Trial) to (60 days of all deadlines) Filed by Jeffrey Hellman on behalf of Deidra M Scruggs, Defendant . (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2 Certification of Service)
	Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted. Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform. A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

10:00 AM
	12-32283 Todd A. Lefkowitz and Mindy J. Lefkowitz Ch. 7
	#150; SCHEDULING ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE: After review of Chapter 7 Trustee's Status Report, ECF No. 149, the court finds cause to sua sponte continue the status conference scheduled for November 5, 2025, to a later date for purposes of judicial efficiency. Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: That, on or before December 3, 2025, the Chapter 7 Trustee shall file a status report; and it is furtherORDERED: That, the status conference scheduled for November 5, 2025 is continued to January 28, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, should the case remain pending at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on October 27, 2025.
	23-30592 Sandra Malave Ch. 7
	#60; Chapter 7 Trustee's Final Report and Proposed Distribution and Application for Compensation, and Application(s) for Compensation of Professionals filed on behalf of Trustee Kara S. Rescia. The United States Trustee has reviewed the Chapter 7 Trustee's Final Report, Application for Compensation and Applications(s) of Compensation of Professionals. Filed by Kim L. McCabe, U.S. Trustee. (Attachments: # 1 Surplus worksheet # 2 Chapter 7 Trustee fees and expenses # 3 NFR)
	23-30971 Robert S. Natale, Sr. and Louise G. Natale Ch. 13
	#162; Affidavit of Non-Compliance with Certificate of Service Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC Creditor. (RE: 38 Stipulation filed by Creditor Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC). (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)
	24-30301 Efrem R Graham and Megan C Graham Ch. 13
	#184; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 2019 NISSAN PATHFINDER. with certicate of service and proposed order Receipt #A11808467 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Walter J. Onacewicz on behalf of Santander Bank, N.A., as servicer for Santander Consumer USA Inc., Creditor, or in the alternative Motion for Adequate Protection Filed by Walter J. Onacewicz on behalf of Santander Bank, N.A., as servicer for Santander Consumer USA Inc., Creditor. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit and Exhibits) Contested Matter Response(s) due by 3/24/2026.
	#189; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 16 Tumblebrook Rd., Meriden, CT 06450-4756. Receipt #A11832948 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Vincent J. Averaimo on behalf of CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 4/14/2026.
	24-31124 Buffalo B. Ziegler and Joelle A. Ziegler Ch. 13
	#102; Stipulation with NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC and BUFFALO B. ZIEGLER and JOELLE A. ZIEGLER . Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Nationstar Mortgage LLC Creditor. (RE: 81 Motion for Relief From Stay filed by Creditor Nationstar Mortgage LLC).
	#121; ORDER APPROVING OF RESOLUTION OF OBJECTION TO CLAIM AND CANCELLING HEARINGS: After review of the Stipulation filed as ECF No. 120 between Nissan-Infiniti LT LLC fka Nissan-Infiniti LT and Buffalo B. Ziegler and Joelle A. Ziegler, Debtors, setting forth an agreement to resolve the Debtor's Objection to Claim 7, ECF No. 80, the court agrees the Motion is resolved by the Stipulation between the parties; and it is furtherORDERED: The status conference scheduled to be heard March 18, 2026, at 10:30 a.m., and the evidentiary hearing scheduled to be heard on May 12, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. will not be held in light of the Stipulation. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 17, 2026. (RE: 80 Objection to Claim filed by Debtor Buffalo B. Ziegler, Debtor Joelle A. Ziegler, [116] Scheduling Order/Pretrial Order, 120 Stipulation filed by Debtor Buffalo B. Ziegler, Debtor Joelle A. Ziegler).
	25-30429 Harry Kipperman and Bonnie Kipperman Ch. 7
	#41; Chapter 7 Trustee's Final Report and Proposed Distribution and Application for Compensation, and Application(s) for Compensation of Professionals filed on behalf of Trustee Andrea M. O'Connor. The United States Trustee has reviewed the Chapter 7 Trustee's Final Report, Application for Compensation and Applications(s) of Compensation of Professionals. Filed by Kim L. McCabe, U.S. Trustee. (Attachments: # 1 Chapter 7 Trustee Commission and Expenses # 2 NFR)
	25-30659 Randy Edward Feldman Ch. 7
	#25; SCHEDULING ORDER: A status conference to address what needs to occur to fully administer this Chapter 7 case shall be held on May 27, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., should this case remain pending at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 9, 2026.
	25-30826 Steven C. Usher Ch. 13
	#39; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 2021 Subaru Forester Wagon, VIN: JF2SKARC5MH441539. Receipt #A11785041 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Capital One Auto Finance, a division of Capital One, N.A., Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 3/6/2026.
	25-30949 Jacqueline Rodriguez Ch. 13
	#59; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 100 Saltonstall Parkway, East Haven, Connecticut 06512. Receipt #A11813820 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Sammy Hooda on behalf of Idaho Housing & Finance Association, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 3/26/2026.
10:30 AM
	23-30114 Cynthia Lowery Ch. 13
	#124; Affidavit of Default with Certificate of Service Filed by Sara Buchanan on behalf of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely as owner trustee for RCF 2 Acquisition Trust Creditor. (RE: [105] Order).
	24-30672 Torrie White and Michael White Ch. 13
	#77; Affidavit of Non-Compliance with Certificate of Service Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Freedom Mortgage Corporation Creditor. (RE: 50 Stipulation filed by Creditor Freedom Mortgage Corporation). (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)
	25-30364 Ian J. Speanburg and Cathleen A. Speanburg Ch. 13
	#80; Affidavit of Default with Certificate of Service Filed by Sara Buchanan on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Creditor. (RE: [74] Scheduling Order/Pretrial Order).
	26-30026 Alan Michael Giacomi and Lisa Valentine Coville-Giacomi Ch. 7
	#41; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 70 Arvida Road Wolcott, Connecticut 06716. Receipt #A11839399 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Sara Buchanan on behalf of US Bank National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely as trustee for RMAC Trust, S, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 4/16/2026.
	#44; Motion to Extend Automatic Stay Filed by Lisa Valentine Coville-Giacomi and Alan Michael Giacomi, Debtors.
11:00 AM
	26-30223 Joshua Darrell Apple and Ashley Michelle Apple Ch. 7
	#9; Reaffirmation Agreement with Joshua Darrell Apple and Ashley Michelle Apple, Debtors Filed by Bank of America, N.A., Creditor. (Catterton, Candy) Modified on 4/14/2026
	Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted. Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform. A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

11:00 AM
	25-31100 Michael Henry Lotto Ch. 13
	#31; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ATTORNEY SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR IGNORING COURT ORDERS AND SCHEDULING A HEARING: This case was dismissed because the Debtor and Debtor's counsel failed to use the current version of the Court's Local Form Chapter 13 Plan of Reorganization. ECF Nos. 9, 25; See also, Local Bankr.R. Appendix E. This error was not corrected despite the Court raising the issue on several occasions. ECF Nos. 10, 13, 17. Because the use of an outdated bankruptcy form is an error attributable to counsel, rather than the Debtor, the Court retained jurisdiction to review Attorney Michael J. Habib's attorneys fees, and so established a deadline for him to file an application for compensation, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 330, along with detailed time records, a copy of the letter of engagement for this case, the amount and date of each payment by the Debtor to Attorney Habib, and an explanation for the Debtor's failure to file a Chapter 13 Plan given the various Orders to Show Cause. ECF No. 25.Attorney Habib failed or refused to comply with the Court's Order entered as ECF No. 25.In addition to Attorney Habib's non-compliance with ECF No. 25, this case bears several hallmarks consistent with a case filed in bad faith for an improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation, in violation of Fed.R.Bankr.P. 9011. For example:1) The Debtor failed to use appropriate local forms;2) neither the Debtor nor Attorney Habib appeared at any of the four scheduled 11 U.S.C. § 341 meetings in this case;3) This is the Debtor's third Chapter 13 Bankruptcy case in two years; and4) The Debtor filed this case on the same date as a scheduled foreclosure sale (see Connecticut Superior Court Case No. NNH-CV-196092761-S, Doc. 149.10).Notably, the Debtor also did not take other steps which would be expected of a debtor in a Chapter 13 case, such as making pre-confirmation plan payments to the Chapter 13 Trustee or providing required documents pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 521. ECF No. 21.Attorney Habib was counsel of record in both of the Debtor's previous Chapter 13 cases. Case Nos. 24-30774 and 25-30311. The Court dismissed the 2025 Case after the Debtor failed to respond to an Order to Show Cause regarding unreasonable delay by the Debtor within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). Case No. 25-30311, ECF Nos. 15, 31. As with this case, the Debtor also filed the 2025 Case on the eve of a foreclosure sale. Case No. NNH-CV-196092761-S, Doc. 136.00. The Debtor made no Chapter 13 plan payments in his 2025 case, as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and there is no indication the Debtor or Attorney Habib appeared at a § 341 meeting in the 2025 Case. Neither the Debtor nor Attorney Habib appeared at the confirmation hearing scheduled in the 2025 Case and the Chapter 13 Trustee represented she was unable to contact Attorney Habib regarding the 2025 Case. Case No. 25-30311, ECF No. 29. An almost identical pattern can be seen in the Debtor's 2024 Chapter 13. Case No. 24-30774. See also Case No. NNH-CV-196092761-S, Doc. 127.00.Pursuant to Fed.R.Bankr.P. 9011(c)(3) and 11 U.S.C. § 105 the Court has inherent authority to sanction attorneys practicing before it. See In re Markus, 78 F.4th 554, 565 (2d Cir. 2023) (bankruptcy court has inherent authority to sanction attorneys that practice before it); see also In re Reyes, 651 B.R. 99, 133 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2023) ('courts may use inherent power to sanction where the attorney has negligently or recklessly failed to perform his responsibilities as an officer of the court')Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before May 15, 2026, Attorney Habib must file a written response to this Order showing cause why he should not be sanctioned for his failure to comply with this Court's Order at ECF No. 25. Attorney Habib's response must also detail the facts and circumstances supporting a conclusion that the commencement of this case was not frivolous or was not undertaken merely to delay a creditor. And, it is further,ORDERED: On May 28, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. the Court will hold a hearing to consider a possible sanction taking into account any response filed by Attorney Habib, at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, CT. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on April 17, 2026.
	Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted. Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform. A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

United States Bankruptcy Court

District of Connecticut

Honorable Ann M. Nevins