Calendar for Ann M. Nevins

10:00 AM

24-30317 Brian Bixby Ch. 13

#104; Motion to Modify a Confirmed Plan Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Brian Bixby, Debtor (RE: 60 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Brian Bixby) (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)

25-30972 Charles T. Murphy and Cathleen Patricia Murphy Ch. 13

#38; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Janine M. Becker on behalf of Cathleen Patricia Murphy, Charles T. Murphy Debtors (RE: 13 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Charles T. Murphy, Debtor Cathleen Patricia Murphy)

#44; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On October 16, 2025, the Debtors commenced this case by filing a petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 25-30972. The Debtors are required to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for an unreasonable delay by the Debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). ACCORDINGLY, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 25, 2026, the Debtors may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 24, 2026.

#65; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments , Provide Documents, Retain a Realtor and Show Feasible with Proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

26-30068 Ariel Melendez Ch. 13

#35; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before July 16, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On July 23, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

#41; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Carl T. Gulliver on behalf of Ariel Melendez Debtor (RE: 20 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Ariel Melendez)

26-30097 Richard Doolittle Ch. 13

#12; Motion to Extend Automatic Stay . Filed by Joseph J. D'Agostino Jr. on behalf of Richard Doolittle, Debtor. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2 Affidavit)

#46; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Joseph J. D'Agostino Jr. on behalf of Richard Doolittle Debtor (RE: 11 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Richard Doolittle)

#64; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before July 16, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On July 23, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

#69; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments , Provide Documents, Make Adequate Protection Payments to the Trustee for the Benefit of CHFA Pursuant to the Stipulation and Serve all Creditors with Proposed Order and Certificate of Serviceand Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

26-30217 Morgan Barrett Douglas and Jason Michael Douglas Ch. 13

#44; Fourth Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Jason Michael Douglas, Morgan Barrett Douglas Debtors (RE: 25 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Morgan Barrett Douglas, Debtor Jason Michael Douglas)

10:30 AM

25-30899 Susan Delgrippo Jaramillo Ch. 13

#33; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before February 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On February 26, 2026, at 11:30 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on January 20, 2026.

#64; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Susan Delgrippo Jaramillo Debtor (RE: 43 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Susan Delgrippo Jaramillo)

25-30973 Ledy J. Madero Ch. 13

#79; Interim Application for Compensation for Scott M. Charmoy, Debtor's Attorney, Fee: $13432.50, Expenses: $1224.47. Filed by Scott M. Charmoy, Attorney. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 5/7/2026.

26-30262 Antonio Vargas, Jr. Ch. 13

#12; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Antonio Vargas Jr. Debtor .

#28; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before July 16, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On July 23, 2026, at 10:30 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

26-30436 Alicia M. Brantley-Diverniero Ch. 13

#34; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Alicia M. Brantley-Diverniero Debtor (RE: 26 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Alicia M. Brantley-Diverniero)

26-30450 Dowling Ray Phillip Ch. 13

#26; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Dowling Ray Phillip Debtor (RE: 10 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Dowling Ray Phillip)

26-30451 Jonhn Cambizaca Ch. 13

#16; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Jonhn Cambizaca Debtor (RE: 10 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Jonhn Cambizaca)

26-30475 Laura Ida Busk Ch. 13

#3; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Janine M. Becker on behalf of Laura Ida Busk Debtor .

11:00 AM

24-30672 Torrie White and Michael White Ch. 13

#85; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

25-30841 William C. Evans Ch. 13

#38; Motion to Dismiss Case Under-Funded with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

26-30111 David Paul Zabilowski Ch. 13

#17; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before June 2, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On June 9, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on April 27, 2026.

#28; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Francis E. Lamboley on behalf of David Paul Zabilowski Debtor (RE: 21 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor David Paul Zabilowski, 27 Objection to Confirmation of the Plan filed by Trustee Roberta Napolitano) (Lamboley, Francis) Modified on 6/9/2026

#42; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments , Provide Documents, File a Plan that Conforms to the Proofs of Claim Filed and Show Feasible with Proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement plan payment receipt schedule)

#46; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Francis E. Lamboley on behalf of David Paul Zabilowski Debtor .

26-30311 Mopula Forbes Ch. 13

#30; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before July 16, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On July 23, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on June 2, 2026.

#43; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Mopula Forbes Debtor (RE: 22 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Mopula Forbes)

26-30314 Brunilda Lopez Ch. 13

#24; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before July 16, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On July 23, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on June 2, 2026.

#47; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Brunilda Lopez Debtor (RE: 34 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Brunilda Lopez)

26-30462 Charlene Jenkins Ch. 13

#19; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Charlene Jenkins Debtor (RE: 10 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Charlene Jenkins)

11:30 AM

25-30949 Jacqueline Rodriguez Ch. 13

#70; Motion to Dismiss Case Under-Funded with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

25-30966 Andrew Consiglio Ch. 13

#83; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH A THREE-YEAR BAR TO REFILING: On October 15, 2025, the self-represented Debtor commenced this Chapter 13 case. Despite the long pendency of this case, the Debtor has failed to satisfy a majority of the basic obligations required of Chapter 13 debtors by the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtor has neither filed nor confirmed a Chapter 13 plan and has failed to file numerous other required documents. Though the Debtor was previously granted additional time to cure these deficiencies, they remain uncorrected despite repeated notices from the Court. See ECF Nos. 4, 17, 20.The record reflects the Debtor failed to appear on nine (9) dates scheduled for the meeting of creditors required pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 341(a), failed to make any plan payments to the Chapter 13 Trustee, and only paid a single installment of the filing fee. See ECF Nos. 5, 24, 36, 41, 48-51, 65, 78. Each of these deficiencies constitutes independent cause for dismissal pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1)-(4), and the Court previously entered two Orders to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed on these grounds. ECF Nos. 20, 55.Although the Debtor is proceeding without counsel, he is familiar with a bankruptcy debtor's obligations. This is the Debtor's tenth (10th) bankruptcy case in this District. The timing of these filings closely align with scheduled law dates in the Debtor's foreclosure proceeding, and virtually all of the prior cases were dismissed after the Debtor similarly failed to perform the basic obligations necessary to proceed. See ECF No. 55, p.2.As noted in a prior Order to Show Cause, ECF No. 55, the records contain substantial evidence supporting a finding that the Debtor is not acting in good faith. Courts may dismiss a case with prejudice and impose a bar against future filings where a debtor has acted in bad faith. 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a), 349(a). The Debtor is familiar with this consequence, as this Court previously imposed a two-year bar to refiling in a prior case. See Case No. 19-51465, ECF No. 26. In light of these circumstances, the Court now considers whether dismissal with a three-year bar to refiling is warranted.Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: That on or before July 13, 2026, the Debtor may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: That on July 23, 2026, at 11:30 a.m., a hearing will be held on this Order to Show Cause at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. At this hearing, the Court will consider any written response to this Order to Show Cause and determine whether this case should be dismissed with a three-year bar to re-filing pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 349(a). And it is furtherORDERED: If no written response to this Order to Show Cause is filed, the July 23rd hearing will not be held, and the case will be dismissed with a three-year bar to refiling. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on June 25, 2026.

26-30123 Susan Godek Ch. 13

#69; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before June 2, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On June 9, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

#105; Fifth Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Susan Godek Debtor (RE: 90 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Susan Godek)

26-30204 Matthew P. Schaefer Ch. 13

#35; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On March 9, 2026, the Debtor commenced this case by filing a petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 26-30204. Consistent with the hearing held on June 18, 2026, the Debtor is required to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for an unreasonable delay by the Debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). ACCORDINGLY, it is herebyORDERED: On or before July 16, 2026, the Debtor may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On July 23, 2026, at 11:30 a.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M Nevins on June 22, 2026.<

#49; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Matthew P. Schaefer Debtor (RE: 30 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Matthew P. Schaefer)

01:00 PM

24-30282 Martenia Y. Mims Ch. 13

#116; Motion to Dismiss Case Under-Funded with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#119; Motion to Modify a Confirmed Plan Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Martenia Y. Mims, Debtor (RE: 61 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Martenia Y. Mims) (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)

24-31124 Buffalo B. Ziegler and Joelle A. Ziegler Ch. 13

#132; Motion to Modify a Confirmed Plan Filed by R. Richard Croce on behalf of Buffalo B. Ziegler, Joelle A. Ziegler, Debtors (RE: 70 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Buffalo B. Ziegler, Debtor Joelle A. Ziegler) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit First Modified Chapter 13 Plan)

25-30865 Russell J. Taylor Ch. 13

#72; Final Application for Compensation for The Law Office of Neil Crane, LLC for Jennifer Tremesani, Debtor's Attorney, Fee: $5750.00, Expenses: $313. Filed by Jennifer Tremesani, Attorney. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 6/10/2026. (Tremesani, Jennifer) Modified on 5/21/2026

26-30454 Dennis A. Lanning, Jr. Ch. 13

#4; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Theresa Rose DeGray on behalf of Dennis A. Lanning Jr. Debtor .

#15; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

02:00 PM

22-30009 Anthony C Giannelli Ch. 13

#170; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments No Creditors Remain to be Paid After Relief from Stay has been granted. with Proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement plan payment receipt schedule)

25-30489 Paul Alex Siladi, Jr Ch. 13

#85; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Paul Alex Siladi Jr Debtor (RE: 10 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Paul Alex Siladi)

#123; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Paul Alex Siladi Jr Debtor

#128; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On May 29, 2025, the Debtor commenced this case by filing a petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 25-30489. Consistent with the hearing held on June 9, 2026, the Debtor is required to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for an unreasonable delay by the Debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). ACCORDINGLY, it is herebyORDERED: On or before July 16, 2026, the Debtor may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On July 23, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on June 10, 2026.

25-30895 Tracy Alejandro Ch. 13

#51; Motion to Dismiss Case Under-Funded with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

25-30983 Frederick C. Walker and Candace P. Walker Ch. 13

#36; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before February 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On February 26, 2026, at 11:30 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M Nevins on January 20, 2026.

#67; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Candace P. Walker, Frederick C. Walker Debtors (RE: 51 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Frederick C. Walker, Debtor Candace P. Walker)

25-31199 Jerome A. Cariaso Ch. 13

#16; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#25; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On December 24, 2025, the Debtor commenced this case by filing a petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 25-31199. Consistent with the hearing held on February 26, 2026, the Debtor is required to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for an unreasonable delay by the Debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). ACCORDINGLY, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, the Debtor may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 02:30 p.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 27, 2026.

#62; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Jerome A. Cariaso Debtor (RE: 31 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Jerome A. Cariaso)

#65; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments and Payments Pursuant to the Stipulation (ECF No. 57) with Proposed Order and Certificate of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

26-30027 Staci R Walden Ch. 13

#19; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before April 10, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On April 23, 2026, at 2:30 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 27, 2026.

#45; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by David J. Fabrizi on behalf of Staci R Walden Debtor (RE: 40 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Staci R Walden)

02:30 PM

20-30403 Mark Harold Moorecroft and Diane S. Moorecroft Ch. 13

#146; Motion to Modify a Confirmed Plan Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Diane S. Moorecroft, Mark Harold Moorecroft, Debtors (RE: 109 Amended/Modified Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Mark Harold Moorecroft, Debtor Diane S. Moorecroft) (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)

25-30930 Frank H. Morain Ch. 13

#68; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments and Payments Pursuant to the Stipulation (ECF No. 54) with Proposed Order and Certificate of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

03:00 PM

25-30521 Jo Lynn Wilson Ch. 13

#34; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 1311 Ella T Grasso Blvd, New Haven, Connecticut 06511. Receipt #A11666715 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2018-B, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 12/9/2025.

#68; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jo Lynn Wilson Debtor (RE: 15 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Jo Lynn Wilson)

#102; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On June 3, 2025, the Debtor commenced this case by filing a petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 25-30521. Consistent with the hearing held on June 18, 2026, the Debtor is required to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for an unreasonable delay by the Debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). ACCORDINGLY, it is herebyORDERED: On or before July 16, 2026, the Debtor may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On July 23, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on June 22, 2026.

25-30967 Gisele Reese Ch. 13

#61; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Gisele Reese Debtor (RE: 15 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Gisele Reese) (ndc) (Main Document 61 replaced on 7/16/2026) (Clerks Office ndc). Modified on 7/16/2026

26-30002 Licia Michelle McKnight Ch. 13

#104; Amended Objection to Claim 22 (RE(s):60 Objection to Claim filed by Debtor Licia Michelle McKnight), Filed by Debtor Licia Michelle McKnight. Response to Objection to Claim due by 6/22/2026.

#140; Amended Objection to Claim 16 (RE(s):72 Objection to Claim filed by Debtor Licia Michelle McKnight, 128 Objection to Claim filed by Debtor Licia Michelle McKnight). Filed by Debtor Licia Michelle McKnight Response to Objection to Claim due by 7/11/2026.

#153; Fifth Amended Chapter 13 Plan and Certificate of Service Filed by Licia Michelle McKnight Debtor .

#157; Debtor's Second Amended and Supplemental Objection to Amended Proof of Claim No. 16-3 Filed by Quantum3 Group, LLC as Agent for Crown Asset Management, LLC (RE(s):72 Objection to Claim filed by Debtor Licia Michelle McKnight, 128 Objection to Claim filed by Debtor Licia Michelle McKnight, 140 Objection to Claim filed by Debtor Licia Michelle McKnight). Filed by Debtor Licia Michelle McKnight Response to Objection to Claim due by 8/6/2026.

26-30216 Michelle Scott Ch. 13

#33; Objection to Debtor's Claim of Exemptions with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#44; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before June 2, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On June 9, 2026, at 2:30 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

#72; Fourth Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Michelle Scott Debtor (RE: 66 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Michelle Scott)

04:30 PM

26-30208 Woody Allan Frasier Ch. 13

#5; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Woody Allan Frasier Debtor .

#37; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before June 2, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On June 9, 2026, at 3:30 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted.

Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform.

A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

11:00 AM
	25-30489 Paul Alex Siladi, Jr Ch. 13
	#34; Motion For Sanctions For Violation of the Discharge Injuction 11 USC 524(a), 11 USC 105 Filed by Paul Alex Siladi Jr, Debtor.
	#49; Amended Motion For Sanctions For Violation of the Discharge Injuction 11 USC 524(a), 11 USC 105 Filed by Paul Alex Siladi Jr, Debtor (RE: 34 Motion for Sanctions filed by Debtor Paul Alex Siladi)
	#56; Motion For Sanctions And Civil Contempt For Willful And Malicious Violations of this Court's Discharge Injunction Issued on January 25, 2012, Case Number 11-32614, Filed by Paul Alex Siladi Jr, Debtor.
02:00 PM
	26-30549 Kaster Moving Co., LLC Ch. 11
	#17; Application to Employ Zeisler & Zeisler, P.C. as Debtor's Counsel Filed by Matthew K. Beatman on behalf of Kaster Moving Co., LLC, Debtor.
	#21; Application to Employ Singh Law Firm, P.A. as Debtor's Counsel Filed by Matthew K. Beatman on behalf of Kaster Moving Co., LLC, Debtor. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)
	Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted. Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform. A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

10:00 AM
	18-30623 The Rosegarden Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC and Bridgeport Health Care Center Inc. Ch. 7
	#2311; Motion for Order Authorizing Abandonment, in the Rosegarden case, a Bond Credit, and, in the Bridgeport Health case, an Asserted Tax Refund Filed by Jon P. Newton on behalf of Jon P. Newton, Trustee. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)
	#2326; Motion to Limit Notice - Ex Parte Filed by Jon P. Newton on behalf of Jon P. Newton, Trustee (RE: [2294] Chapter 7 Trustee's Report of No Distribution filed by Trustee Jon P. Newton, 2299 BNC Certificate of Mailing) (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)
	18-50488 Bridgeport Health Care Center Inc. Ch. 7
	#76; Chapter 7 Trustee's Final Report and Proposed Distribution and Application for Compensation, and Application(s) for Compensation of Professionals filed on behalf of Trustee Jon P. Newton. The United States Trustee has reviewed the Chapter 7 Trustee's Final Report, Application for Compensation and Applications(s) of Compensation of Professionals. Filed by Kim L. MCabe, U.S. Trustee. (Attachments: # 1 Chapter 7 Trustee Commission and Expenses # 2 Attorney for Chapter 7 Trustee Fee Application # 3 Accountant for Chapter 7 Trustee Fee Application # 4 Exhibit A # 5 Exhibit B # 6 Exhibit C # 7 NFR # 8 NFR Exhibit 1)
	24-30684 Cynthia A. Moore Ch. 13
	#121; Affidavit of Default with Certificate of Service Filed by Sara Buchanan on behalf of US Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual Capacity But Solely As Owner Trustee For VRMTG Asset Trust Creditor. (RE: [118] Order).
	25-30850 JAMES COFFEY Ch. 13
	#62; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 69 Indian River Rd Milford, Connecticut 06460. Fee Amount $199. Filed by Sara Buchanan on behalf of Citizens Bank, NA, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 5/21/2026.
	26-30157 Anthony M. Yanez and Anna P. Gomez Ch. 7
	#25; Motion to Compromise Claim with Anthony M. Yanez, 56 Harvest Woods Road, Rockfall, CT 06481 with Proposed Order and Certificate of Service Filed by Kara S. Rescia on behalf of Kara S. Rescia, Trustee. (Rescia, Kara) Modified on 6/26/2026
	25-31073 Jason M. LaRosa and Sarah R. LaRosa Ch. 13
	#52; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 18 Evergreen Ave, Middletown, Connecticut 06457. And Certificate of Service Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Rocket Mortgage, LLC s/b/m Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 6/25/2026.
	25-31203 Lee Anne Goerg Ch. 13
	#70; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 2020 Ford Escape having a Vehicle ID# 1FMCU9J94LUA20229. and Certificate of Service Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 6/22/2026.
	26-03009 McCoy v. United States Deparment of Education, its Servicer Ch.
	Adversary proceeding: 26-30345 Casey Jo McCoy #2; Attestation of Casey Jo McCoy in Support of Request for Stipulation Conceding Dischargeability of Student Loans. Filed by Casey Jo McCoy Plaintiff .
10:30 AM
	24-30758 Sabrina Papin Ch. 13
	#81; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 38 Ridge Road, Unit 3, Naugatuck, Connecticut 06770 -1833. Receipt #A11857719 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of CITIZENS BANK NA f/k/a RBS CITIZENS NA, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 5/5/2026.
	24-31029 Mandie Fagan Ch. 13
	#40; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 2014 Mercedes-Benz C-Class, VIN: WDDGF8AB4EG227949. And Certificate of Service Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Capital One Auto Finance, a division of Capital One, N.A., Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 6/1/2026.
	25-30203 Michael S. Simeone and Angela M. Simeone Ch. 13
	#57; Affidavit of Non-Compliance Re: 1 Bargate Rd, Clinton, CT 06413 Filed by Sammy Hooda on behalf of UMB BANK, National Association, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Legal Title Trustee of PRL Title Trust I Creditor. (RE: 34 Motion for Relief From Stay filed by Creditor UMB BANK, National Association, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Legal Title Trustee of PRL Title Trust I, 51 Stipulation filed by Creditor UMB BANK, National Association, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Legal Title Trustee of PRL Title Trust I, [53] Order on Motion to Approve Stipulation).
	25-30492 Jonathan E Weinberger Ch. 13
	#79; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 2020 Nissan Pathfinder, VIN: 5N1DR2BMXLC606715. Receipt #A11823870 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Ally Bank, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 4/3/2026.
	25-30759 Luis O. Ventura Ch. 13
	#50; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 14 -16 Grandview Ave, Waterbury, Connecticut 06708. Receipt #A11854265 Fee Amount $199. Filed by A. Michelle Hart Ippoliti on behalf of U.S. Bank National Association, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 5/1/2026.
	26-30301 Samuel Woychowski Ch. 7
	#11; Motion to Extend Time to to file Objection to Discharge to August 7, 2026 Filed by Melissa L Simonik on behalf of Dutch Point Credit Union, Creditor.
	25-31172 Gionni Burgos Ch. 7
	#30; Attestation of Gionni Burgos in Support of Request for Stipulation Conceding Dischargeability of Student Loans Filed by Gionni Burgos Debtor. (gr) Additional attachment(s) added on 7/7/2026
	26-30469 Kela Laronda Coston Ch. 13
	#13; Letter received regarding schedules Filed by Kela Laronda Coston Debtor. (RE: 1 Voluntary Petition (Chapter 13) filed by Debtor Kela Laronda Coston, 4 Deficiency Notice/Notice of Dismissal).
11:00 AM
	23-30290 Bruce Smith and Flor Smith Ch. 13
	#58; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 149 Whittier Road, New Haven, CT 06515. Receipt #A11830028 Fee Amount $199. Filed by A. Michelle Hart Ippoliti on behalf of NewRez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 4/8/2026.
	25-30027 Alberto H. Tabra and Denise R. Tabra Ch. 13
	#49; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 140 Central Avenue West Haven, Connecticut 06516. And Certificate of Service Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Laelia LLC, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 6/22/2026.
	26-00301 In Re Proceedings to Review Omnibus Motion to Withdraw Appearance of Attorney Jessica L. Braus Ch.
	#2; Omnibus Motion for Authority to Withdraw Appearance as Counsel of Record. Filed by Attorney Jessica L. Braus . (Attachments: # 1 Pending Case List as of June 9, 2026)
	Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted. Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform. A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

United States Bankruptcy Court

District of Connecticut

Honorable Ann M. Nevins