Calendar for Ann M. Nevins

01:00 PM

22-30331 Marcella Harling Ch. 13

#112; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments and Non-Exempt Personal Injury Proceeds with Proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit plan payment receipt schedule)

25-31175 Egan Kealey and Annaliese Sehulster Ch. 13

#29; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtors have enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtors sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, 2026, the Debtors may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 20, 2026.

#49; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Egan Kealey, Annaliese Sehulster Debtors (RE: 43 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Egan Kealey, Debtor Annaliese Sehulster)

25-31198 Anthony R. Ellis Ch. 13

#32; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On December 24, 2025, the Debtor commenced this case by filing a petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 25-31198. Consistent with the hearing held on February 26, 2026, the Debtor is required to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for an unreasonable delay by the Debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). ACCORDINGLY, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, the Debtor may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 02:30 p.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 27, 2026.

#38; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Anthony R. Ellis Debtor (RE: 24 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Anthony R. Ellis)

25-31199 Jerome A. Cariaso Ch. 13

#16; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#25; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: On December 24, 2025, the Debtor commenced this case by filing a petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 25-31199. Consistent with the hearing held on February 26, 2026, the Debtor is required to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for an unreasonable delay by the Debtor that is prejudicial to creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). ACCORDINGLY, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, the Debtor may file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 02:30 p.m., a hearing to consider this Order to Show Cause shall be held at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 27, 2026.

#31; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Jerome A. Cariaso Debtor (RE: 18 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Jerome A. Cariaso)

25-31203 Lee Anne Goerg Ch. 13

#39; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 20, 2026.

#64; Fourth Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Lee Anne Goerg Debtor (RE: 48 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Lee Anne Goerg)

26-30123 Susan Godek Ch. 13

#25; Application to Employ Ariana F. Ceneviva of the Ceneviva Law Firm, LLC as Closing Counsel re: 201 New Cheshire Road, Wallingford, CT Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Susan Godek, Debtor.

#36; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Susan Godek Debtor (RE: 22 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Susan Godek)

#69; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before June 2, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On June 9, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

26-30269 Miguel Suero Ch. 13

#24; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Miguel Suero Debtor (RE: 18 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Miguel Suero)

01:30 PM

26-30038 Leona J. Moffo Ch. 13

#14; Objection to Debtor's Claim of Exemptions with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Trustee.

#22; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before April 16, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On April 23, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 27, 2026.

#41; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Leona J. Moffo Debtor (RE: 39 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Leona J. Moffo)

02:00 PM

21-30086 Bee Chu Ng Ch. 13

#139; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

23-20311 Alfred Parker Mayo, Sr. Ch. 13

#367; ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR TRUSTEE TO SUBMIT FINAL REPORT: On or before June 5, 2026, the Chapter 13 Trustee is directed to submit a Final Report. If the report is not timely filed, a status conference will be held on June 9, 2026 at 2:00 p.m., at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on April 28, 2026. (RE: 353 Order Confirming Chapter 13 Plan).

24-30504 Christina M. Murillo Ch. 13

#104; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

26-30111 David Paul Zabilowski Ch. 13

#17; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before June 2, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On June 9, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on April 27, 2026.

#21; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Francis E. Lamboley on behalf of David Paul Zabilowski Debtor (RE: 4 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor David Paul Zabilowski)

26-30150 Richard M. Courchesne Ch. 13

#21; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by R. Richard Croce on behalf of Richard M. Courchesne Debtor (RE: 2 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Richard M. Courchesne)

26-30167 Malika T. Cowans Ch. 13

#2; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by R. Richard Croce on behalf of Malika T. Cowans Debtor .

26-30323 Anastine M. Richardson Ch. 13

#13; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Audra Buckland on behalf of Anastine M. Richardson Debtor .

02:30 PM

19-30015 Paul Michael Frosolone Ch. 13

#89; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

#105; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: In 2019, the Debtor commenced this Chapter 13 case. On May 10, 2019, ECF No. 28, the Debtor's First Amended Chapter 13 Plan was confirmed, then later modified on March 24, 2021, ECF No. 53. The Trustee filed a Motion to Dismiss on January 22, 2024, ECF No. 89, for the Debtor's failure to make plan payments. Pursuant to a hearing held on November 14, 2024, regarding the Trustee's motion, it is herebyORDERED: Paul Michael Frosolone shall appear remotely or in-person on December 5, 2024, at 2:30 p.m., at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, and show cause why this Chapter 13 case should not be dismissed; and it is furtherORDERED: The Clerk's office is requested to send the ZoomGov connection information to Debtor's counsel to forward to the Debtor. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on November 18, 2024.

22-30205 Roy E. Salerno, Sr. Ch. 13

#51; Motion to Dismiss Case default in plan Filed by Kevin J. Daly Jr, on behalf of Corporation Counsel City of Waterbury, Creditor.

23-30844 Paul J. Buell, II and Joelene Buell Ch. 13

#155; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

25-30406 Madeleine Hudgens Ch. 13

#101; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

26-30216 Michelle Scott Ch. 13

#23; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Michelle Scott Debtor (RE: 18 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Michelle Scott)

#33; Objection to Debtor's Claim of Exemptions with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#44; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before June 2, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On June 9, 2026, at 2:30 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

03:00 PM

18-32065 Trina E. Greene Ch. 13

#241; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

20-31321 Delores J. Greenlee Ch. 13

#132; Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments (including certification and proposed order) Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee

25-30489 Paul Alex Siladi, Jr Ch. 13

#85; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Paul Alex Siladi Jr Debtor (RE: 10 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Paul Alex Siladi)

25-30521 Jo Lynn Wilson Ch. 13

#68; Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jo Lynn Wilson Debtor (RE: 15 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Jo Lynn Wilson)

25-30895 Tracy Alejandro Ch. 13

#51; Motion to Dismiss Case Under-Funded with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

25-30991 Charles L. Gargano Ch. 13

#36; Objection to Debtor's Claim of Exemptions with proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Trustee.

#46; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before February 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On February 26, 2026, at 10:30 a.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on January 26, 2026.

#62; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments , Provide Documents, File a Plan that Conforms to the Proofs of Claim Filed and Show Feasible with Proposed Order and Certification of Service Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#66; 4th Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Joseph J. D'Agostino Jr. on behalf of Charles L. Gargano Debtor (RE: 57 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Charles L. Gargano)

#71; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 21 Brown Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06511. Receipt #A11793414 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual Capacity But Solely As Owner Trustee For Rcf 2 Acquisition Trust, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 3/12/2026.

26-30006 Lakeysha J. Fields Ch. 13

#27; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before March 19, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On March 26, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on February 20, 2026.

#55; Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Lakeysha J. Fields Debtor (RE: 34 Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Before Confirmation) filed by Debtor Lakeysha J. Fields)

26-30304 Anthony A. Alvarado Ch. 13

#10; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by George C. Tzepos on behalf of Anthony A. Alvarado Debtor .

#16; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#20; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before June 2, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On June 9, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

03:30 PM

23-30032 Rose M. Rick Ch. 13

#89; Motion to Modify a Confirmed Plan Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Rose M. Rick, Debtor (RE: 25 Amended/Modified Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Rose M. Rick) (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)

26-30154 Brahim Gouhmid Ch. 13

#11; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Joseph J. D'Agostino Jr. on behalf of Brahim Gouhmid Debtor .

#21; Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to Make Plan Payments and Inability to Propose a Confirmable Plan Filed by Roberta Napolitano on behalf of Roberta Napolitano, Trustee.

#28; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before June 2, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On June 9, 2026, at 3:30 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

26-30208 Woody Allan Frasier Ch. 13

#5; Chapter 13 Plan Filed by Woody Allan Frasier Debtor .

#37; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before June 2, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On June 9, 2026, at 3:30 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

26-30300 Mia N. Bridgeforth Ch. 13

#27; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CHAPTER 13 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: Since the petition date in this Chapter 13 case, the Debtor has enjoyed the benefit of the automatic stay provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a). The Debtor sought and received a continuance of the initial hearing to consider confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan, and so the Chapter 13 Trustee is not yet authorized to distribute Chapter 13 Plan payments to creditors. The delay in confirming a Chapter 13 Plan may constitute an unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1307(c)(1), § 1324(b).Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED: On or before June 2, 2026, the Debtor may file a statement detailing the reasons this case should not be dismissed, including any response to any filed objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 Plan; and it is furtherORDERED: On June 9, 2026, at 3:30 p.m., a hearing will be held at 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut, to consider whether this Chapter 13 case should be dismissed, and the court may enter an order dismissing the case at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on May 22, 2026.

#31; First Amended Chapter 13 Plan Before Confirmation Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of Mia N. Bridgeforth Debtor (RE: 9 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Mia N. Bridgeforth)

Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted.

Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform.

A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

10:00 AM
	23-30009 John R. DeAngelis, Jr. Ch. 13
	#58; Application to Employ Gene Pica of RE/MAX Alliance as Real Estate Agent & Approve Fees Filed by Jennifer Tremesani on behalf of John R. DeAngelis Jr., Debtor.
	24-30758 Sabrina Papin Ch. 13
	#81; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 38 Ridge Road, Unit 3, Naugatuck, Connecticut 06770 -1833. Receipt #A11857719 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of CITIZENS BANK NA f/k/a RBS CITIZENS NA, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 5/5/2026.
	25-30492 Jonathan E Weinberger Ch. 13
	#79; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 2020 Nissan Pathfinder, VIN: 5N1DR2BMXLC606715. Receipt #A11823870 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Ally Bank, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 4/3/2026.
	25-30759 Luis O. Ventura Ch. 13
	#50; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 14 -16 Grandview Ave, Waterbury, Connecticut 06708. Receipt #A11854265 Fee Amount $199. Filed by A. Michelle Hart Ippoliti on behalf of U.S. Bank National Association, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 5/1/2026.
	25-30779 Pamela M. Robillard Ch. 13
	#37; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 1396 N Colony Rd Unit 1B, Meriden, CT 06450. And Certificate of Service Receipt #A11838179 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of Rushmore Servicing as servicing agent for Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 4/15/2026.
	25-30966 Andrew Consiglio Ch. 13
	#53; Memorandum of Decision and Order Denying In Rem Relief Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(4) and Order to Show Cause Regarding Whether Case Dismissal Should be with Prejudice (RE: 37 Motion for Relief From Stay filed by Creditor NewRez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, 43 Motion to Dismiss Case filed by Debtor Andrew Consiglio).
	25-31203 Lee Anne Goerg Ch. 13
	#55; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 86 Hickory Lane, Cheshire, CT 06410. Receipt #A11850416 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Melissa L Simonik on behalf of Waterbury CT Teachers Federal Credit Union, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 4/28/2026.
	26-30007 Robert R. D'Aurelio Ch. 7
	#16; Motion to Compromise Claim with Robert DAurelio, 321 Zion Hill Road, Milford, CT 06461 with Ex "A" Settlement Agreement, Proposed Order and Certificate of Service Filed by Kara S. Rescia on behalf of Kara S. Rescia, Trustee.
10:30 AM
	23-30290 Bruce Smith and Flor Smith Ch. 13
	#58; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 149 Whittier Road, New Haven, CT 06515. Receipt #A11830028 Fee Amount $199. Filed by A. Michelle Hart Ippoliti on behalf of NewRez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 4/8/2026.
	25-30429 Harry Kipperman and Bonnie Kipperman Ch. 7
	#41; Chapter 7 Trustee's Final Report and Proposed Distribution and Application for Compensation, and Application(s) for Compensation of Professionals filed on behalf of Trustee Andrea M. O'Connor. The United States Trustee has reviewed the Chapter 7 Trustee's Final Report, Application for Compensation and Applications(s) of Compensation of Professionals. Filed by Kim L. McCabe, U.S. Trustee. (Attachments: # 1 Chapter 7 Trustee Commission and Expenses # 2 NFR)
	25-30659 Randy Edward Feldman Ch. 7
	#25; SCHEDULING ORDER: A status conference to address what needs to occur to fully administer this Chapter 7 case shall be held on May 27, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., should this case remain pending at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Ann M. Nevins on March 9, 2026.
	26-20329 Clifford Hartford LLC Ch. 11
	#33; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 20 Clifford Street, Hartford, CT. Fee Amount $199. Filed by Peter J. Royer on behalf of City of Hartford, Creditor. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Complaint # 2 Exhibit B - Order # 3 Proposed Order) Contested Matter Response(s) due by 5/26/2026.
	26-30026 Alan Michael Giacomi and Lisa Valentine Coville-Giacomi Ch. 7
	#51; Motion for Relief from Stay regarding 2015 AUDI A3 SEDAN, VIN: WAUBFGFF1F1051275. Receipt #A11863633 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Linda St. Pierre on behalf of CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, A DIVISION OF CAPITAL ONE, N.A., Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 5/11/2026.
	26-30324 Phien Dinh Le Ch. 7
	#16; Motion for In Rem Relief from Automatic Stay regarding 47 North Mead Farm Road Seymour, Connecticut 06483. Receipt #A11864549 Fee Amount $199. Filed by Sara Buchanan on behalf of US Bank Trust Company, National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 SC6 Title Trust, Creditor. Contested Matter Response(s) due by 5/11/2026. (Buchanan, Sara) Modified on 5/28/2026
11:00 AM
	18-30623 The Rosegarden Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC and Bridgeport Health Care Center Inc. Ch. 7
	#2294; Final Chapter 7 Trustee's Report of No Distribution: I, Jon P. Newton, having been appointed trustee of the estate of the above-named debtor, The Rosegarden Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC, report that I have neither received any property nor paid any money on account of this estate; that I have made a diligent inquiry into the financial affairs of the debtor and the location of the property belonging to the estate; and that there is no property available for distribution from the estate over and above that exempted by law. Pursuant to Fed R Bank P 5009, I hereby certify that the estate of the above-named debtor has been fully administered. I request that I be discharged from any further duties as trustee. Key information about this case as reported in schedules filed by the debtor or otherwise found in the case record: This case was pending for 97 months. Assets Abandoned (without deducting any secured claims): $ 946647.26, Assets Exempt: Not Available, Claims Scheduled: $ 4106863.53, Claims Asserted: Not Applicable, Claims scheduled to be discharged without payment (without deducting the value of collateral or debts excepted from discharge): $ 4106863.53. Filed by Jon P. Newton, Trustee. (RE: 1912 Meeting of Creditors). (Newton, Jon). Modified on 4/15/2026 to specify the name of the Debtor referenced.
	18-50488 Bridgeport Health Care Center Inc. Ch. 7
	#71; Notice of Status Conference Issued. Status Conference to be held on 5/6/2026 at 11:00 AM at United States Bankruptcy Court, 157 Church Street, 18th Floor Courtroom, New Haven, CT.
03:00 PM
	25-03007 Vereen v. Scruggs Ch.
	Adversary proceeding: 25-30607 Deidra M Scruggs #17; Motion to Withdraw Appearance Filed by Scott M. Charmoy on behalf of Dairwood Vereen, Plaintiff .
	Adversary proceeding: 25-30607 Deidra M Scruggs #20; Motion to Extend Time to (Motion for Extension of Time of Sixty Days of All Deadlines and Continuation of Trial) to (60 days of all deadlines) Filed by Jeffrey Hellman on behalf of Deidra M Scruggs, Defendant . (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2 Certification of Service)
	Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted. Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform. A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

10:00 AM
	25-03007 Vereen v. Scruggs Ch.
	Adversary proceeding: 25-30607 Deidra M Scruggs #1; Adversary case 25-03007. Complaint (62 (Dischargeability - 523(a)(2), false pretenses, false representation, actual fraud)) (67 (Dischargeability - 523(a)(4), fraud as fiduciary, embezzlement, larceny)) filed by Scott M. Charmoy on behalf of Dairwood Vereen against Deidra M Scruggs. Receipt #A11574732 Fee Amount $350. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Adversary Proceeding Cover Sheet)
	Important Policy Notice to the Bar, Public, and Media The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut is open to the public and in-person court observation is permitted. Pursuant to policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States and D. Conn. Bankr. L. R. 5073−1, it is absolutely prohibited to record, photograph, rebroadcast or retransmit Court proceedings (including streaming, screen−shots or any other audio or video reproduction). This prohibition applies to in-person hearing or trial participants or observers and persons granted remote access to hearings, trials, and other proceedings held before the Court via ZoomGov, CourtSolutions, CourtCall, or any other remote communication platform. A violation of these prohibitions is subject to sanctions, including but not limited to restricted access to future hearings, removal of court issued media credentials, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

United States Bankruptcy Court

District of Connecticut

Honorable Ann M. Nevins